After 2 years with the pacemaker, the doctor told me things had changed and I now meet the requirements to also have the defibrillator, so they replaced it with an all in one device. About 12 years ago I had a cardiac ablation performed which later necessitated a pacemaker. And it could be a life or death deal.Īce, I have one I've had it for about ten years now. This one's more predictable - probably a matter of when, not if. Think of all the things we do, buy, or install as protection against unlikely events. Is there any reason to believe there won't be more in the future? Aside from suddenly getting much younger? I'd rather have the defib in place when the next one happens. If everything that could happen does, you will probably be lucky to make it out alive.

You might want a second opinion, but if you don't, have the thing installed. Better to have it and not need it as opposed to need it and not have it. If pro-gunners are as murderous as anti-gunners claim, why are there so many anti-gunners still running their mouths? Give me $1 every time a Liberal lies, I'll give you $5 every time one tells the truth I'll end up a wealthy man, you'll end up broke. Doc says it may save my life sometime, or it may just sit there and never need to do anything. So now I just have to decide if I want it or not. The nurse says the only big problem having one is I'd have to give up any plans for a second career as a MMA fighter just wouldn't be a good idea. Says the damage from all the past incidents has me just on the edge between 'needing' it and 'good idea just in case'. whether or not to let Doc implant a defibrillator.

Honey select update 0630